Engineering Ethics – Section 6
Lawrence Kohlberg cited a model for his Moral improvement hypothesis. This model is famously called the Heinz’s Dilemma.
Story of Heinz
An account of a moderately aged normal working class man, called Heinz is considered for instance. Heinz is a standard man having a spouse. His significant other experiences a loathsome malady. Specialists accept that an extraordinary medication which was developed as of late and is accessible at the BIG pharma store, can just spare his better half.
At the point when Heinz went to purchase the medication, the medication dealer cost it around $2,000 dollars, while the real assembling expense of the medication is $20 dollars. Heinz acquired the cash from companions and banks and could at long last gather just $1,000 dollars. Despite the fact that Heinz argued a ton, the insatiable medication merchant wouldn’t sell the medication requiring little to no effort.
Presently, Heinz had no other choice however to take the medication from the shop to spare the life of his better half. Is this a superior alternative to do? What is your judgment?
Story of Heinz
Presently, to illuminate this present Heinz’s situation, a mastermind has the accompanying choices.
Alternatives for the Thinker
In this segment, we will talk about the choices for the Thinker.
Heinz ought not take the medication since it is the insubordination of law.
Heinz can take the medication, yet ought to be rebuffed by the law.
Heinz can take the medication and no law ought to rebuff him.
The appropriate response which you pick shows your ethical advancement. Each answer has its outcomes and clarification. Release us through the appropriate responses.
Heinz ought not take the medication since it is the rebellion of law.
This choice makes it incomprehensible for Heinz to spare his significant other. His better half passes on and the rich medication dealer winds up more extravagant. In spite of the fact that the law was complied, no ethical equity was finished. This is a pre-traditional degree of good reasoning.
Heinz can take the medication, yet ought to be rebuffed by the law.
This choice enables Heinz to spare his better half, however Heinz will be kept in jail. In spite of the fact that Heinz took an ethical choice, he needed to experience the discipline. This is a Conventional degree of good reasoning.
Heinz can take the medication and no law ought to rebuff him.
This choice gives Heinz a chance to spare his better half and them two can live cheerfully. This reasoning depends on the idea that the unbending nature in law ought to be rejected and equity ought to be done on good grounds. This is a post-ordinary degree of good reasoning.